The Coalition for Oral Health Policy, an initiative of the Santa Fe Group, published “All Veterans Deserve Comprehensive Dental Care.” This article addresses the critical gap in dental care access for U.S. veterans, highlighting how limited eligibility for dental services contributes to health challenges and financial strain. The authors propose actionable policy solutions to expand access tackling issues such as workforce shortages and outdated eligibility criteria to ensure all veterans receive the comprehensive care they deserve.
CMS Seeks Input to Streamline Medicare Regulations
– Comment by June 10. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is issuing this Request for Information (RFI) to solicit public feedback on potential changes to Medicare regulations with the goal of reducing the expenditures required to comply with Federal regulations. Examples of questions they would like input on include:
- Are there documentation or reporting requirements within the Medicare program that are overly complex or redundant?
- How can Medicare better align its requirements with best practices and industry standards?
- Are there existing regulatory requirements that could be waived, modified, or streamlined to reduce administrative burdens?
Healthcare providers, researchers, stakeholders, health and drug plans, and other members of the public should submit all comments in response to this RFI through the online submission form. For assistance or technical problems related to this form, please send an email to: patientsoverpaperwork@cms.hhs.gov.
Are HCC Risk Scores a Reliable Health Status Indicator Across Rural and Urban Areas?
This brief from the ETSU/NORC Rural Health Research Center examines differences in Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk scores between rural and urban Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries across four common chronic conditions: hypertension, diabetes, depression, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. HCC coding is a risk assessment tool developed by CMS to estimate future health care costs.
Report: 100 Rural Hospitals Have Closed Labor and Delivery in 5 Years
From Becker’s Hospital Review
Labor and delivery services have ended or are set to end at 100 rural hospitals since the end of 2020, highlighting a growing maternal health access crisis across the U.S.
The findings come from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform’s most recent report on rural maternity care. Since the beginning of 2025, Becker’s has also reported on 13 maternity service closures, with four alone closing in Maine.
The report also revealed that 42% of U.S. rural hospitals still provide labor and delivery services, with less than one-third offering the services in 10 states. Over 130 rural hospitals that still deliver babies lost money in the last two years and could be forced to close the services to maintain financial sustainability.
Travel time to access labor and delivery services in rural areas has also increased. In many urban areas, the services are often accessible in less than 20 minutes, but in rural areas, travel times can take as much as 30 to 50 minutes.
“Rural maternity care is in a state of crisis, and more women and babies in rural communities will die unnecessarily until the crisis is resolved,” the report said. “Federal and state government officials and private employers must take immediate action to ensure that all health insurance plans are paying adequately to support high-quality maternity care in every community.”
Below are 10 states from the report that have seen heightened levels of labor and delivery unit closures since 2020. Their drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services along with the number of rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025 are also listed, per the report.
CHQPR’s full report can be accessed here.
1. Alabama
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 36
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 45 minutes
2. Connecticut
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: One
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: One
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 31 minutes
3. Florida
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Two
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 20
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 50 minutes
4. Idaho
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 14
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
5. Illinois
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery in 2025: 58
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 32 minutes
6. Indiana
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: 11
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 29
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
7. Maine
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Six
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 13
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 41 minutes
8. Ohio
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Eight
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 38
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes
9. Pennsylvania
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 31
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes
10. Wyoming
- Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
- Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 11
- Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 60 minutes
PHC4 Releases New Reports, Displaying Utilization Insights, at a County-Level
The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) published a new set of County-Level Utilization Reports today, displaying the overall total number of inpatient hospitalizations and ambulatory/outpatient cases for Pennsylvania residents.
The information reflects outpatient data from hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory procedure data from freestanding ambulatory surgery centers in Pennsylvania from Quarter 3 of 2024. Also reflected is inpatient data for the same time period from acute care, long-term acute care, rehabilitation, psychiatric, and specialty hospitals, presenting a spectrum of focused data, at a county-level.
Barry D. Buckingham, PHC4’s Executive Director, believes that these reports provide a wealth of insight for stakeholders. “Providing these quarterly County-Level Utilization Reports supports a consistent supply of fact-based data. These insights represent a vast range of facility data and are amongst the timeliest reports available to stakeholders.” The reports are updated every quarter and show the number of cases for each county, with breakouts by patient age, sex, and payer.
These quarterly reports portray the current climate of public health in Pennsylvania and provide focus and perspective. The County-Level Utilization Reports are valued resources for local communities, health care professionals, and policymakers. By fostering a data-driven approach to health care, PHC4 envisions a healthier, more resilient society where resources are allocated effectively, and lives are improved. PHC4 aims to continue to serve its mission of empowering Pennsylvanians through transparency.
PHC4 is an independent council formed under Pennsylvania statute (Act 89 of 1986, as amended by Act 15 of 2020) in order to address rapidly growing health care costs. PHC4 continues to produce comparative information about the most efficient and effective health care to individual consumers and group purchasers of health services. In addition, PHC4 produces information used to identify opportunities to contain costs and improve the quality of care delivered.
For more information, visit phc4.org or access the reports here.
The Rural and Urban Supply of Clinicians With a DEA Waiver to Prescribe Buprenorphine in 2022 Prior to the Elimination of the Waiver Requirement
Among key findings from the WWAMI Rural Health Research Center:
- Overall, the supply of eligible clinicians grew in both rural and urban counties in the five years from 2017 to 2022.
- Despite this growth, more rural counties lacked waivered clinicians (30.1 percent) compared to urban counties (10.4 percent) in 2022, and rural counties had a lower overall supply of clinicians per 100,000 population (25.2) compared to urban counties (32.6).
- Small and remote rural counties had the greatest proportion of counties without a clinician (41.3 percent) compared to other rural counties.
Pennsylvania Childhood Pre-K Fact Sheets & Mapping Available
Each year, PPC creates interactive maps for the Pre-K for PA campaign, and the 2025 maps and corresponding fact sheets are now available. Data on pre-k is available at the statewide, county, school district, and legislative district levels.
The maps highlight the unmet need for high-quality, publicly funded pre-k at each geographic level, including data points such as the eligible child population, high-quality, publicly funded enrollment, and the number of high-quality pre-k locations.
Statewide, of the 151,325 eligible children ages 3-4 living in Pennsylvania, only 44% have access to high-quality pre-kindergarten. With workforce challenges in the sector, an additional 8,477 pre-k staff are needed to serve the remaining eligible children.
As part of an enacted 2025-26 budget, the Pre-K for PA campaign is asking the General Assembly to:
- Support the proposed investment of $15 million in Pre-K Counts to help stabilize early learning providers by boosting per-child rates to help combat inflationary pressures and staffing shortages caused by low wages.
- Include an investment of $9.5 million for the Head Start Supplemental Assistance Program to help stabilize the Head Start Workforce.
Access the new fact sheet and online map here.
Dead Zone: Rural Hospitals and Patients Are Disconnected From Modern Care
Leroy Walker arrived at the county hospital short of breath. Walker, 65 and with chronic high blood pressure, was brought in by one of rural Greene County’s two working ambulances.
Nurses checked his heart activity with a portable electrocardiogram machine, took X-rays, and tucked him into Room 122 with an IV pump pushing magnesium into his arm.
“I feel better,” Walker said. Then: Beep. Beep. Beep.
The Greene County Health System, with only three doctors, has no intensive care unit or surgical services. The 20-bed hospital averages a few patients each night, many of them, like Walker, with chronic illnesses.
Greene County residents are some of the sickest in the nation, ranking near the top for rates of stroke, obesity, and high blood pressure, according to data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Patients entering the hospital waiting area encounter floor tiles that are chipped and stained from years of use. A circular reception desk is abandoned, littered with flyers and advertisements.
But a less visible, more critical inequity is working against high-quality care for Walker and other patients: The hospital’s internet connection is a fraction of what experts say is sufficient. High-speed broadband is the new backbone of America’s health care system, which depends on electronic health records, high-tech wireless equipment, and telehealth access.
Greene is one of more than 200 counties with some of the nation’s worst access to not only reliable internet, but also primary care providers and behavioral health specialists, according to a KFF Health News analysis. Despite repeated federal promises to support telehealth, these places remain disconnected.
During his first term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order promising to improve “the financial economics of rural healthcare” and touted “access to high-quality care” through telehealth. In 2021, President Joe Biden committed billions to broadband expansion.
KFF Health News found that counties without fast, reliable internet and with shortages of health care providers are mostly rural. Nearly 60% of them have no hospital, and hospitals closed in nine of the counties in the past two decades, according to data collected by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
Click here for more information and a interactive map that shows where health care shortages and broadband deserts intersect.
Pennsylvania Is 2025’s 4th Best State for Children’s Health Care: WalletHub Study
With workers paying an average of nearly $6,300 per year toward employer-sponsored family coverage and Every Kid Healthy Week kicking off on April 21, the personal-finance website WalletHub today released its report on 2025’s Best & Worst States for Children’s Health Care, as well as expert commentary.
In order to determine which states offer the most cost-effective and highest-quality health care for children, WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across 33 key metrics. The data set ranges from the share of children aged 0 to 17 in excellent or very good health to pediatricians and family doctors per capita.
Children’s Health Care in Pennsylvania (1=Best; 25=Avg.):
- Overall Rank: 4th
- 8th – % of Children in Excellent/Very Good Health
- 27th – % of Uninsured Children
- 23rd – Infant-Death Rate
- 11th – % of Children with Unaffordable Medical Bills
- 3rd – Pediatricians & Family Doctors per Capita
- 19th – % of Obese Children
- 11th – % of Children with Excellent/Very Good Teeth
For the full report, please visit: https://wallethub.com/edu/best-states-for-child-health/34455
Key takeaways and WalletHub commentary are included below in text and video format. Feel free to use the provided content as is or edit the raw files as you see fit.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if you would like to arrange a phone, video or in-studio interview with one of WalletHub’s experts.
NIH Study: Social Factors Explain Worse Cardiovascular Health for Rural Adults
With funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), researchers looked at data from more than 27,000 adults to understand what contributes to substantially higher rates of cardiovascular mortality among the nearly 60 million U.S. adults living in rural areas compared to their urban counterparts. The study found substantial rural-urban disparities in cardiometabolic risk factors and cardiovascular diseases, which were largest among younger adults (aged 20-39 years) and almost entirely explained by social risk factors.