Rural Health Information Hub Latest News

New Resource: Management Methodologies and Value-Based Strategies: An Overview for Rural Health Care Leaders

The Rural Health Value team has released a new resource outlining eight commonly used change management methodologies that are rural-relevant. It is intended as a guide to help rural health care leaders identify which approach(es) might be most useful to them and their organizations.

Management Methodologies and Value-Based Strategies: An Overview for Rural Health Care LeadersOffers rural health leaders an overview of eight commonly used management methodologies to help guide change, plus additional resources and references for further exploration. (June 2019)

Top resources on the Rural Health Value website:

  • Value-Based Care Assessment – Assess capacity and capabilities to deliver value-based care. Receive an eight category readiness report.
  • Physician Engagement – Score current engagement and build effective relationships to create a shared vision for a successful future.
  • Board and Community Engagement – Hold value-based care discussions as part of strategic planning and performance measurement.
  • Social Determinants of Health – Learn and encourage rural leaders/care teams to address issues to improve their community’s health.

Contact information:

Keith J. Mueller, Ph.D.

Co-Principal Investigator

keith-mueller@uiowa.edu

Rural health could be a powerful issue in the 2020 election

The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill

As former senators from rural states, we’ve seen firsthand the importance of providing affordable, quality care to those living in rural areas. The isolation that exists in some parts of South Dakota and Maine means residents have limited access to care.

Many patients must travel great distances to even reach a hospital. Yet more and more rural hospitals are closing around the country. In fact, 106 of them have shut down since 2010. It is staggering to think of these challenges when, compared to people living in urban and suburban areas, rural Americans are generally older and poorer, more uninsured or underinsured, and therefore less healthy.

Rural health is a bipartisan issue that greatly concerns all Americans. While it has never been a top tier issue on the campaign trail, we believe it could be a powerful topic in the 2020 election and demands attention by policymakers and candidates.

Our survey with the American Heart Association conducted by Morning Consult, shows that 92 percent of Democrats and 93 percent of Republicans consider access to rural health an important issue. Perhaps even more encouraging, three in five voters say they are more likely to endorse a candidate who makes access to rural health care a priority.

At a time when Democrats and Republicans agree on little, it is clear rural health transcends political parties. However, efforts by lawmakers to revive rural America have been largely unsuccessful in recent years. People living in remote areas continue to face greater disparities and barriers to high-quality health care than those in non-rural communities.

More than half of the rural voters polled say access to medical specialists, such as cardiologists, oncologists and gynecologists, is a problem in their local community, compared to 33 percent of non-rural voters, and more than one-quarter (27 percent) say it is difficult to access behavioral health professionals, compared to 16 percent of non-rural voters. Forty-seven percent of rural voters also agree access to quality health care is a challenge, compared to 34 percent of non-rural voters.

In addition to our national poll, we surveyed adults living in three rural states that will be important in the 2020 election: Iowa, North Carolina, and Texas. When it comes to accessing medical services or treatment, rural voters are more likely than urban and suburban voters to agree that appointment availability (56 vs. 50 percent) and the distance to receive care (50 vs. 37 percent) are obstacles.

Today, nearly 60 million Americans live in rural communities. Data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show these residents have a greater risk of dying from heart disease, cancer, stroke, and chronic lower respiratory disease, and that should prompt candidates and policymakers alike, to take action.

Four policy options could help rural communities receive the quality care they deserve:

First, allow rural communities to adjust their health care services to better suit the needs of their local area. Critical Access Hospitals and other rural inpatient facilities need pathways to transform, in order to focus on emergency and outpatient services, and primary and prevention-focused care.

In Texas alone, 17 hospitals have closed in the past nine years. One in five Texas voters say it is difficult to access hospitals, urgent care facilities, primary care physicians, and medical specialists in their community.

Second, create new payment mechanisms for rural providers that account for low patient volumes, growing health care needs, and demographic trends in rural communities. Facilitate alternative payment and care delivery models that could help hospitals transition to value-based care.

Third, build and support a sustainable and diverse workforce. The patient-to-primary care physician ratio in urban areas is 53 physicians per 100,000 people, while rural areas have only 40 physicians for the same number of residents.  

Indeed, our survey shows that one in three rural adults in North Carolina — and 46 percent in Iowa — believe that access to medical specialists and quality health care are problems in their communities. New workforce models should be designed with universities and community health centers to expose providers to rural environments and telemedicine. Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists could also help fill vital primary care roles.

Fourth, expand telemedicine services to virtually connect patients with medical professionals. To be an effective tool, rural areas need adequate broadband and reimbursement for services.

Geography should never be an impediment to quality care. Tackling the barriers to delivering high-quality and efficient health care to rural America is long overdue. With the 2020 election campaign underway, candidates and policymakers have an opportunity to create a health care system that better serves all Americans.

Tom Daschle is a former Senate majority leader from South Dakota and a co-founder of the Bipartisan Policy Center.  Olympia Snowe is a former Senator from Maine and a BPC board member and senior fellow. They co-chair BPC’s Rural Health Task Force.   

CDC Information on Syringe Services Programs

CDC Information on Syringe Services Programs.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently updated information they provide on community-based prevention programs that can provide a range of services, including linkage to substance use disorder treatment; access to and disposal of sterile syringes and injection equipment; and vaccination, testing, and linkage to care and treatment for infectious diseases.

VA Announces Final Community Care Regulations under MISSION Act

VA Announces Final Community Care Regulations under MISSION Act. On June 5, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) announced the publication of two final regulations as part of its new Veterans Community Care Program under the VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018. One of the rules focuses on a new urgent care benefit. VA also published the final regulation for the Veterans Community Care Program governing how eligible Veterans receive necessary hospital care, medical services, and extended care services from non-VA entities or providers in the community. The new Veterans Community Care Program replaces the Veterans Choice Program, which expired June 6, 2019. Of note, the final rule addresses payment of higher rates to health care providers in highly rural areas. The term “highly rural area” means an area located in a county that has fewer than seven individuals residing in that county per square mile.

CMS Requests Feedback Reducing Regulatory Burden

 CMS Requests Feedback Reducing Regulatory Burden – August 12.  On June 6, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a Request for Information (RFI) seeking new ideas from the public on how to reduce administrative and regulatory burden as part of the agency’s Patients over Paperwork initiative. CMS is especially seeking innovative ideas that broaden perspectives on potential solutions to relieve burden and ways to improve: reporting and documentation requirements; coding and documentation requirements for Medicare or Medicaid payment; prior authorization procedures; policies and requirements for rural providers, clinicians, and beneficiaries; policies and requirements for dually enrolled (i.e., Medicare and Medicaid) beneficiaries; beneficiary enrollment and eligibility determination; and CMS processes for issuing regulations and policies.

HRSA Requests Public Feedback on Health Center Service Areas

 HRSA Requests Public Feedback on Health Center Service Areas – July 8.  The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is seeking input from the public on service area considerations that may inform decisions to expand the program through the addition of new service delivery sites onto existing health centers.  The considerations include factors such as proximity to existing health centers, parameters for unmet need, and consultation with other local providers.   

Unmet Need for Personal Care Assistance Among Rural and Urban Older Adults

Unmet Need for Personal Care Assistance Among Rural and Urban Older Adults.  Despite differences in health, health services, economic, and demographic characteristics, little is known about whether rural and urban areas differ in unmet need for personal care for older adults with functional limitations. This brief from the University of Minnesota Rural Health Research Center addresses that gap by analyzing rural-urban differences in unmet need for help across 11 activities

HRSA Releases Allied Health Workforce Projections for 2016–2030

HRSA Releases Allied Health Workforce Projections for 2016–2030. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) recently released Allied Health Workforce Projections providing national-level health workforce estimates for the following occupations: chiropractors and podiatrists, emergency medical technicians and paramedics, medical and clinical laboratory technologists, occupational and physical therapists, optometrists and opticians, pharmacists, registered dieticians, and respiratory therapists.  While shortages of health care providers in rural areas is well-known, consistent data on rural allied health professionals has been difficult to collect and analyze.  Visit HRSA’s Bureau of Health Workforce website to see more data, projections, and federal programs.

Challenges of the Rural Opioid Epidemic: Treatment and Prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C.

Challenges of the Rural Opioid Epidemic: Treatment and Prevention of HIV and Hepatitis C. Previous research on HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) among people who inject drugs (PWID) has focused on urban or international populations, yet the US opioid epidemic is moving away from metropolitan centers. In this report, researchers examine the increasing rurality of opioid injection, the challenges to treatment and prevention that are unique to rural areas, and the public health interventions needed to address them.

Pennsylvania Has Third-highest Rate of Drug Overdose Deaths in the U.S., Study Finds

(June 12, 2019)  Philadelphia Inquirer.  A new study measuring the effectiveness of state health systems around the country found that Pennsylvania has the third-highest rate of drug overdose deaths in the country.

The “scorecard,” released by the Commonwealth Fund, a private health-care research foundation, rated Pennsylvania highly on other measures, including access to health care. The state’s 2015 Medicaid expansion has allowed hundreds of thousands to obtain care, including about 20,000 people with substance use disorders, state health officials say.

But Pennsylvania’s opioid crisis is so severe, and so much worse than almost anywhere else in the country, that it’s bringing down life expectancy in the state, researchers said.

The study measured “drug poisoning deaths” in 2017, the last year for which full statewide data are available. Only Ohio and West Virginia had higher overdose death rates than Pennsylvania that year. All three states had more than twice the national rate of drug overdose deaths in 2017. Along with seven other states, including Delaware, the trio have seen overdose deaths increase threefold since 2005.

In Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Ohio, overdose death rates were at least five times higher than alcohol-related deaths (including acute alcohol poisoning and more chronic diseases like liver cirrhosis), and about three times higher than suicide deaths.

East Coast and Southeastern states have been particularly hard-hit by the opioid crisis, the researchers wrote. In the West, alcohol and suicide deaths generally outstrip drug deaths.

Still, said Sarah Collins, the fund’s vice president for health-care coverage and access, “In other indicators, including coverage, Pennsylvania’s ranked very high. What that does for the state is, it puts it in a position where it’s better able to manage a crisis.”

State officials said they were seeing some encouraging signs of progress. After losing more than 5,400 Pennsylvanians to overdoses in 2017, estimates for 2018 were closer to 4,200 overdose deaths — a drop of about 22 percent, Rachel Levine, state secretary of health, said Tuesday.

Philadelphia had 1,217 overdose deaths in 2017 and 1,116 overdose deaths the following year.

The contamination of much of Pennsylvania’s illicit drug supply with fentanyl, a synthetic opioid that is significantly more powerful than heroin, is driving most of the state’s drug deaths, she said.

But Commonwealth Fund researchers said it’s hard to say why certain states — even Medicaid expansion states like Pennsylvania with relatively good health-care access — are affected more by overdose deaths than others.

“We do not have all the correlates of what’s driving [alcohol, suicide, and drug poisoning deaths], of why there are so many regional differences, and we don’t have a broad-base understanding of what’s effective in terms of preventing the rise in what we see,” Collins said.

Levine said that though overdose deaths decreased in 2018, the state’s approach to the opioid crisis is still “all hands on deck.”

Pennsylvania is about to declare its seventh successive disaster declaration over the overdose crisis, which enables state agencies to collaborate in an “opioid command center” and allows state officials to bypass regulations that might hinder a quicker response to the crisis.

The state Centers of Excellence, 45 opioid addiction recovery programs mainly for people on Medicaid, have treated 18,760 people in the last two years. (In Philadelphia alone, city officials have estimated, 50,000 to 70,000 people are addicted to opioids.)

The state has also distributed thousands of doses of the overdose reversal drug naloxone.

“We’re not done by any means, we’re not declaring victory, but we have made a lot of progress,” Levine said. “I’m a positive and optimistic person, and I think we will be successful, but we’re keeping our nose to the grindstone.”