Rural Health Information Hub Latest News

COVID Worsened Shortages of Doctors and Nurses. Five Years On, Rural Hospitals Still Struggle

Even by rural hospital standards, Keokuk County Hospital and Clinics in southeastern Iowa is small.

The 14-bed hospital, in Sigourney, doesn’t do surgeries or deliver babies. The small 24-hour emergency room is overseen by two full-time doctors.

CEO Matt Ives wants to hire a third doctor, but he said finding physicians for a rural area has been challenging since the covid-19 pandemic. He said several physicians at his hospital have retired since the start of the pandemic, and others have decided to stop practicing certain types of care, particularly emergency care.

Another rural hospital is down the road, about a 40-minute drive east. Washington County Hospital and Clinics has 22 beds and is experiencing similar staffing struggles. “Over the course of the last few years, we’ve had not only the pandemic, but we’ve had kind of an aging physician workforce that has been retiring,” said Todd Patterson, CEO.

The pandemic was difficult for health workers. Many endured long hours, and the stresses on the nation’s health care system prompted more workers than usual to quit or retire.

Read more.

Report: 100 Rural Hospitals Have Closed Labor and Delivery in 5 Years

From Becker’s Hospital Review

Labor and delivery services have ended or are set to end at 100 rural hospitals since the end of 2020, highlighting a growing maternal health access crisis across the U.S.

The findings come from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform’s most recent report on rural maternity care. Since the beginning of 2025, Becker’s has also reported on 13 maternity service closures, with four alone closing in Maine.

The report also revealed that 42% of U.S. rural hospitals still provide labor and delivery services, with less than one-third offering the services in 10 states. Over 130 rural hospitals that still deliver babies lost money in the last two years and could be forced to close the services to maintain financial sustainability.

Travel time to access labor and delivery services in rural areas has also increased. In many urban areas, the services are often accessible in less than 20 minutes, but in rural areas, travel times can take as much as 30 to 50 minutes.

“Rural maternity care is in a state of crisis, and more women and babies in rural communities will die unnecessarily until the crisis is resolved,” the report said. “Federal and state government officials and private employers must take immediate action to ensure that all health insurance plans are paying adequately to support high-quality maternity care in every community.”

Below are 10 states from the report that have seen heightened levels of labor and delivery unit closures since 2020. Their drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services along with the number of rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025 are also listed, per the report.

CHQPR’s full report can be accessed here.

1. Alabama

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 36
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 45 minutes

2. Connecticut

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: One
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: One
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 31 minutes

3. Florida

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Two
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 20
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 50 minutes

4. Idaho

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services  in 2025: 14
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes

5. Illinois

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery in 2025: 58
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 32 minutes

6. Indiana

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: 11
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 29
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes

7. Maine

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Six
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 13
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 41 minutes

8. Ohio

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Eight
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 38
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 30 minutes

9. Pennsylvania

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Four
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 31
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 39 minutes

10. Wyoming

  • Labor and delivery unit closures since 2020: Three
  • Rural hospitals with no labor and delivery services in 2025: 11
  • Median drive time to hospitals with labor and delivery services: 60 minutes

PHC4 Releases New Reports, Displaying Utilization Insights, at a County-Level

The Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) published a new set of County-Level Utilization Reports today, displaying the overall total number of inpatient hospitalizations and ambulatory/outpatient cases for Pennsylvania residents.

The information reflects outpatient data from hospital outpatient departments and ambulatory procedure data from freestanding ambulatory surgery centers in Pennsylvania from Quarter 3 of 2024. Also reflected is inpatient data for the same time period from acute care, long-term acute care, rehabilitation, psychiatric, and specialty hospitals, presenting a spectrum of focused data, at a county-level.

Barry D. Buckingham, PHC4’s Executive Director, believes that these reports provide a wealth of insight for stakeholders. “Providing these quarterly County-Level Utilization Reports supports a consistent supply of fact-based data. These insights represent a vast range of facility data and are amongst the timeliest reports available to stakeholders.” The reports are updated every quarter and show the number of cases for each county, with breakouts by patient age, sex, and payer.

These quarterly reports portray the current climate of public health in Pennsylvania and provide focus and perspective. The County-Level Utilization Reports are valued resources for local communities, health care professionals, and policymakers. By fostering a data-driven approach to health care, PHC4 envisions a healthier, more resilient society where resources are allocated effectively, and lives are improved. PHC4 aims to continue to serve its mission of empowering Pennsylvanians through transparency.

PHC4 is an independent council formed under Pennsylvania statute (Act 89 of 1986, as amended by Act 15 of 2020) in order to address rapidly growing health care costs. PHC4 continues to produce comparative information about the most efficient and effective health care to individual consumers and group purchasers of health services. In addition, PHC4 produces information used to identify opportunities to contain costs and improve the quality of care delivered.

For more information, visit phc4.org or access the reports here.

States Ranked by Potential Coverage Losses under Medicaid Work Requirements

From Becker’s Hospital Review

California is projected to experience the largest potential losses in Medicaid coverage if federal work requirements are enacted, according to an analysis released by the Urban Institute on April 14.

Approximately five million adults across the country could lose Medicaid coverage next year under a possible federal mandate requiring adults aged 19 to 55 in Medicaid expansion states to work. At least 10,000 adults in nearly every expansion state could lose coverage, with the largest losses occurring in the most populous states.

These coverage reductions are likely to stem from a lack of awareness or confusion about the new policy, rather than from enrollees failing to work. The extent of the losses could also vary depending on the final policy and how each state implements the work requirements.

The study examined a proposal that would withhold federal funds for adult Medicaid enrollees in expansion states who do not report working at least 80 hours per month, or who do not meet exemption criteria such as being a student, caregiver, or having a disability. Similar legislation has been proposed in several states this year.

States ranked by potential coverage losses under Medicaid work requirements:

  • California: 1 to 1.2 million
  • New York: 743,000 to 846,000
  • Illinois: 193,000 to 220,000
  • Pennsylvania: 174,000 to 198,000
  • North Carolina: 171,000 to 195,000
  • Arizona: 166,000 to 189,000
  • Ohio: 158,000 to 180,000
  • Michigan: 145,000 to 165,000
  • Washington: 121,000 to 138,000
  • Kentucky: 120,000 to 136,000
  • Louisiana: 116,000 to 132,000
  • New Jersey: 115,000 to 131,000
  • Indiana: 102,000 to 116,000
  • Virginia: 98,000 to 111,000
  • Maryland: 95,000 to 109,000
  • Colorado: 95,000 to 108,000
  • Massachusetts: 86,000 to 98,000
  • Oregon: 83,000 to 95,000
  • New Mexico: 75,000 to 86,000
  • Connecticut: 74,000 to 85,000
  • Missouri: 69,000 to 78,000
  • Minnesota: 67,000 to 76,000
  • Arkansas: 62,000 to 70,000
  • Nevada: 59,000 to 67,000
  • Oklahoma: 47,000 to 53,000
  • West Virginia: 38,000 to 44,000
  • Iowa: 34,000 to 39,000
  • District of Columbia: 26,000 to 30,000
  • Rhode Island: 25,000 to 29,000
  • Hawaii: 24,000 to 27,000
  • Montana: 23,000 to 27,000
  • Utah: 20,000 to 23,000
  • Idaho: 17,000 to 20,000
  • Delaware: 17,000 to 20,000
  • New Hampshire: 17,000 to 19,000
  • Nebraska: 13,000 to 15,000
  • Maine: 11,000 to 13,000
  • Alaska: 10,000 to 11,000
  • South Dakota: 8,000 to 9,000
  • Vermont: 7,000 to 8,000
  • North Dakota: 5,000 to 6,000

Federal Rural Hospital Technical Assistance Finder Now Available on RHIhub!

In collaboration with the Rural Health Information Hub (RHIhub), the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy(FORHP)  has released a new tool to help rural hospitals and rural health clinics identify FORHP programs that provide free technical assistance to improve financial and operational performance, quality, and transition to value-based care.

Check out the new FORHP Rural Hospital Technical Assistance Finder at https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/hospital-ta or on the RHIhub homepage.

Center for Rural Pennsylvania Hosts Hearing on Advancing Rural Mental Health Awareness and Support

On April 8, 2025, the Center for Rural Pennsylvania Board of Directors held a public hearing at the Capitol Building in Harrisburg to advance awareness and support for rural mental health. The hearing brought together lawmakers, mental healthcare professionals, and community leaders to discuss ongoing challenges and potential solutions related to mental health care in rural Pennsylvania.

“We know rural Pennsylvania faces a unique set of challenges when it comes to mental health care,” said Senator Gene Yaw, Chairman of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania Board of Directors. “Limited access to providers, long distances to travel for treatment, and a shortage of specialized resources all contribute to a system facing significant barriers. The Center for Rural Pennsylvania is working to find innovative solutions to address these challenges. This hearing was an important step towards building a more accessible and supportive mental health system for all Pennsylvanians, no matter where they live.”

“The testimony shared at this hearing highlights the urgent need for ongoing collaboration and solutions to address the mental health challenges facing rural Pennsylvania,” said Representative Eddie Day Pashinski, Vice Chairman of the Center’s Board. “This effort includes expanding access to services, tackling workforce shortages, and reducing stigma.”

“We want Pennsylvania to be a place where mental health services are accessible and effective, no matter where you live,” said Senator Judy Schwank, member of the Center’s Board. “But in our rural communities, people often face a unique set of challenges when it comes to getting the care they need. This hearing is an opportunity to explore some of the most common barriers to mental health care in rural Pennsylvania and begin identifying solutions.”

“I was grateful for the insight provided by mental health professionals, judges, and other officials who testified concerning the unique challenges that exist in rural communities, including homelessness,” said Representative Dan Moul, member of the Center’s Board. “Homelessness is a far more complex problem than I imagined, particularly for those with mental health and substance abuse challenges. Clearly, there is no easy fix, but as we examine this issue, I am hopeful solutions can be found that will build on the resources available.”

“The mental health struggles in our rural communities are not just data points—they’re daily realities for countless Pennsylvanians,” said Dr. Kyle C. Kopko, Executive Director of the Center. “This hearing shed vital light on the challenges and, more importantly, the opportunities to expand care, break down barriers, and ensure no one is left to face these issues alone.”

Testifiers included:

  • The Honorable Judge Tiffany L. Cummings, Magisterial District Court 04-3-03, Tioga County
  • Annette (Annie) L. Strite, M.A., M.H./I.D.D. Administrator and Mental Health Director
  • Andrea B. Kepler, L.C.S.W., Administrator, Dauphin County Mental Health, Autism and Developmental Programs
  • Chris Santarsiero, Vice President of Government Affairs, Connections Health Solutions
  • Kimberly Jones, M.S., L.P.C.S., Vice President of Clinical Operations, Connections Health Solutions
  • Brittney McCarthy, Strategic Account Manager, Connections Health Solutions
  • Dr. Jamie Zelazny, Assistant Professor of Nursing and Psychiatry and Co-Director of the Digital Health Hub, University of Pittsburgh
  • Dr. Brayden N. Kameg, Assistant Professor of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh; Director of the Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Residency Program, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System
  • Dr. Brian Schurr, Central Keystone Counseling

To access the hearing recording and testimony, visit the Center’s website at www.rural.pa.gov.

Pennsylvania Childhood Pre-K Fact Sheets & Mapping Available

Each year, PPC creates interactive maps for the Pre-K for PA campaign, and the 2025 maps and corresponding fact sheets are now available. Data on pre-k is available at the statewide, county, school district, and legislative district levels.

The maps highlight the unmet need for high-quality, publicly funded pre-k at each geographic level, including data points such as the eligible child population, high-quality, publicly funded enrollment, and the number of high-quality pre-k locations.

Statewide, of the 151,325 eligible children ages 3-4 living in Pennsylvania, only 44% have access to high-quality pre-kindergarten. With workforce challenges in the sector, an additional 8,477 pre-k staff are needed to serve the remaining eligible children.

As part of an enacted 2025-26 budget, the Pre-K for PA campaign is asking the General Assembly to:

  • Support the proposed investment of $15 million in Pre-K Counts to help stabilize early learning providers by boosting per-child rates to help combat inflationary pressures and staffing shortages caused by low wages.
  • Include an investment of $9.5 million for the Head Start Supplemental Assistance Program to help stabilize the Head Start Workforce.

Access the new fact sheet and online map here.

CMS Finalizes 2026 Payment Policy Updates for Medicare Advantage and Part D Programs

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Calendar Year (CY) 2026 Rate Announcement for the Medicare Advantage (MA) and Medicare Part D Prescription Drug Programs that finalizes the payment policies for these programs. This release — combined with the CY 2026 MA and Part D final rule that was released on April 4 — makes annual routine and technical updates to the MA and Part D programs.

The actions taken by CMS help protect beneficiaries and taxpayers from waste, fraud, and abuse, while also driving access to high-quality, affordable healthcare through Medicare Advantage. By finalizing these payment policies, CMS is ensuring that Medicare Advantage continues to offer access to critical services in an efficient, accountable manner, further strengthening the program’s ability to serve beneficiaries.

Payments from the government to MA plans are expected to increase on average by 5.06% from 2025 to 2026. This is an increase of 2.83 percentage points since the CY 2026 Advance Notice, which is largely attributable to an increase in the effective growth rate. The method for setting the effective growth rate is set in statute and represents the average expected change in the benchmarks, used to determine payment for MA plans, based on the growth in Medicare per capita costs. The effective growth rate is 9.04%, which is higher than the estimate of 5.93% in the CY 2026 Advance Notice. This change is primarily due to the inclusion of additional data on fee-for-service (FFS) expenditures, including payment data through the fourth quarter of 2024, which was not included on account of the early Advance Notice publication.

In CY 2024, CMS initiated a three-year, phased-in approach for removing the medical education costs — related to services MA enrollees receive — from the historical and projected expenditures supporting the FFS costs that are included in the growth rate calculations. For CY 2026, CMS will complete the phase-in of the technical adjustment by applying 100% of the adjustment for MA-related medical education costs.

CMS is also completing a three-year phase-in of improvements to the MA risk adjustment model that the agency finalized in the CY 2024 Rate Announcement, with the first year of the three-year phase-in starting with CY 2024. CMS is committed to expanding access to affordable, high-quality care through Medicare Advantage, while also implementing measures to safeguard beneficiaries and taxpayers from waste, fraud, and abuse. These ongoing improvements support a sustainable program that benefits both current and future Medicare recipients.

CMS is concurrently releasing the Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions that continue to implement the redesign of the Medicare Part D program. These instructions contain a detailed description of, and guidance related to, changes to the Part D drug benefit in place for CY 2026.

The CY 2026 MA and Part D Rate Announcement may be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/2026-announcement.pdf.

A fact sheet discussing the provisions of the CY 2026 Rate Announcement can be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/2026-medicare-advantage-and-part-d-rate-announcement.

The Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions can be found at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/final-cy-2026-part-d-redesign-program-instruction.pdf.

A fact sheet discussing the provisions of the Final CY 2026 Part D Redesign Program Instructions can be viewed at https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/final-cy-2026-part-d-redesign-program-instructions

Blockbuster Deal Will Wipe Out $30 Billion in Medical Debt. Even Backers Say It’s Not Enough.

Underscoring the massive scale of America’s medical debt problem, a New York-based nonprofit has struck a deal to pay off old medical bills for an estimated 20 million people.

Undue Medical Debt, which buys patient debt, is retiring $30 billion worth of unpaid bills in a single transaction with Pendrick Capital Partners, a Virginia-based debt trading company. The average patient debt being retired is $1,100, according to the nonprofit, with some reaching the hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The deal will prevent the debt being sold and protect millions of people from being targeted by collectors. But even proponents of retiring patient debt acknowledge that these deals cannot solve a crisis that now touches around 100 million people in the U.S.

“We don’t think that the way we finance health care is sustainable,” Undue Medical Debt chief executive Allison Sesso said in an interview with KFF Health News. “Medical debt has unreasonable expectations,” she said. “The people who owe the debts can’t pay.”

In the past year alone, Americans borrowed an estimated $74 billion to pay for health care, a nationwide West Health-Gallup survey found. And even those who benefit from Undue’s debt relief may have other medical debt that won’t be relieved.

This large purchase also highlights the challenges that debt collectors, hospitals, and other health care providers face as patients rack up big bills that aren’t covered by their health insurance.

Read more.

Dead Zone: Rural Hospitals and Patients Are Disconnected From Modern Care

Leroy Walker arrived at the county hospital short of breath. Walker, 65 and with chronic high blood pressure, was brought in by one of rural Greene County’s two working ambulances.

Nurses checked his heart activity with a portable electrocardiogram machine, took X-rays, and tucked him into Room 122 with an IV pump pushing magnesium into his arm.

“I feel better,” Walker said. Then: Beep. Beep. Beep.

The Greene County Health System, with only three doctors, has no intensive care unit or surgical services. The 20-bed hospital averages a few patients each night, many of them, like Walker, with chronic illnesses.

Greene County residents are some of the sickest in the nation, ranking near the top for rates of stroke, obesity, and high blood pressure, according to data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Patients entering the hospital waiting area encounter floor tiles that are chipped and stained from years of use. A circular reception desk is abandoned, littered with flyers and advertisements.

But a less visible, more critical inequity is working against high-quality care for Walker and other patients: The hospital’s internet connection is a fraction of what experts say is sufficient. High-speed broadband is the new backbone of America’s health care system, which depends on electronic health records, high-tech wireless equipment, and telehealth access.

Greene is one of more than 200 counties with some of the nation’s worst access to not only reliable internet, but also primary care providers and behavioral health specialists, according to a KFF Health News analysis. Despite repeated federal promises to support telehealth, these places remain disconnected.

During his first term, President Donald Trump signed an executive order promising to improve “the financial economics of rural healthcare” and touted “access to high-quality care” through telehealth. In 2021, President Joe Biden committed billions to broadband expansion.

KFF Health News found that counties without fast, reliable internet and with shortages of health care providers are mostly rural. Nearly 60% of them have no hospital, and hospitals closed in nine of the counties in the past two decades, according to data collected by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Click here for more information and a interactive map that shows where health care shortages and broadband deserts intersect.