- Social Factors Help Explain Worse Cardiovascular Health among Adults in Rural Vs. Urban Communities
- Reducing Barriers to Participation in Population-Based Total Cost of Care (PB-TCOC) Models and Supporting Primary and Specialty Care Transformation: Request for Input
- Secretary Kennedy Renews Public Health Emergency Declaration to Address National Opioid Crisis
- Secretary Kennedy Renews Public Health Emergency Declaration to Address National Opioid Crisis
- 2025 Marketplace Integrity and Affordability Proposed Rule
- Rural America Faces Growing Shortage of Eye Surgeons
- NRHA Continues Partnership to Advance Rural Oral Health
- Comments Requested on Mobile Crisis Team Services: An Implementation Toolkit Draft
- Q&A: What Are the Challenges and Opportunities of Small-Town Philanthropy?
- HRSA Administrator Carole Johnson, Joined by Co-Chair of the Congressional Black Maternal Health Caucus Congresswoman Lauren Underwood, Announces New Funding, Policy Action, and Report to Mark Landmark Year of HRSA's Enhancing Maternal Health Initiative
- Biden-Harris Administration Announces $60 Million Investment for Adding Early Morning, Night, and Weekend Hours at Community Health Centers
- Volunteer Opportunity for HUD's Office of Housing Counseling Tribe and TDHE Certification Exam
- Who Needs Dry January More: Rural or Urban Drinkers?
- Rural Families Have 'Critical' Need for More Hospice, Respite Care
- States Help Child Care Centers Expand in Bid To Create More Slots, Lower Prices
Rural Communities May Be Especially Impacted By Essential Places Closing
All communities rely on physical spaces that are vital to the well-being of their citizens, such as grocery stores, recreational facilities and pharmacies. But what happens when these places are lost, especially in rural areas where no alternatives exist?
Two new studies led by researchers in Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences and College of Health and Human Development — one published in the journal Wellbeing, Space and Society and the other in the Journal of Rural Health — analyzed the experiences of residents in one such rural Pennsylvania community after the closure of several of these essential places.
Closures included a grocery store, bank, hardware store, church, primary care clinic, pharmacy and two restaurants — some due to population loss and some as the result of the pandemic.
Both studies found that the loss of these spaces had well-being and social impacts. For example, the loss of the area’s only grocery store severely limited access to healthy food and decreased opportunities for social connection. Additionally, the loss of the area’s sole pharmacy and health care facility resulted in impacts on health, such as delays in seeking care and an over-reliance on local emergency medical services.
Kristina Brant, co-author on both papers and assistant professor of rural sociology, said the findings help showcase why the closures of community institutions — especially in rural areas — matter, and could help policymakers and practitioners find ways to improve and sustain well-being for these communities.
“While some people may be able to travel to the next town over to access services, this isn’t possible for everyone, so these closures could perpetuate inequalities between residents,” Brant said. “By documenting how communities are impacted by these closures, we can better show why helping communities preserve their institutions is important, while also considering strategies to help communities adapt and pivot when they do lose essential community institutions.”
In recent years, the researchers said, there has been population loss across much of rural America. Between 2010 and 2020, two-thirds of rural counties saw a decrease in their populations. And when populations decrease, community institutions can be threatened — it can be difficult to sustain businesses and organizations amid a declining number of community members.
Danielle Rhubart, first author of the paper in Wellbeing, Space and Society and assistant teaching professor of biobehavioral health, said it’s important to consider how a loss of these institutions can impact the community members who stay.
“A lot of the focus in previous research has been on the importance of these places in urban settings,” said Rhubart, who also co-authored the paper in the Journal of Rural Health. “We were interested in how the loss of these community institutions impacts rural community health and well-being.”
For both studies, the researchers interviewed 26 local residents. Questions were broad and open-ended, including ones about perceptions of the interviewees’ community. While the studies were limited to one area, the researchers said their findings could represent similar experiences in other rural locations across the United States.
In the paper led by Rhubart, the researchers examined how community members were affected by the loss of spaces not related to health care, such as grocery stores. In the paper in the Journal of Rural Health — led by Hazel Velasco Palacios, a doctoral student in rural sociology and in women’s, gender, and sexuality studies — the team explored how people were impacted by the loss of the area’s only health care institution.
“While we were interested in the closures in their community, we did not lead with this, choosing instead to ask questions such as ‘What are some of the challenges that you think the town and the people who live here are facing?’” Brant said. “The fact that so many respondents answered this question by talking about the closures signaled to us how these closures were top of their list of concerns.”
They found that following the loss of the area’s only clinic and pharmacy, community members reported having to travel farther for basic health care needs, which added stress to their lives. People also reported becoming increasingly dependent on others to get care — for example, needing to rely on neighbors or friends for rides.
Velasco Palacios said while this reliance on social networks demonstrates the self-resilience of the community, it also posed challenges.
“In cases where networks were not robust or relationships became strained, some residents struggled to access reliable care,” she said. “This dual nature of social networks — both a critical lifeline and a potential vulnerability — adds nuance to our understanding of how rural communities adapt to the loss of essential services.”
Residents also reported that this restricted access led to people being more likely to delay seeking care, to call on emergency medical services and to ration medication to make it last longer, suggesting that the loss of local health care institutions could contribute to negative health outcomes.
But the researchers found that the loss of places not obviously linked to health — such as grocery stores and banks — also has the potential to impact health and well-being. Because these spaces are often multifunctional and the only one of their kind in the area, Brant said, losing these places may be especially impactful in rural areas.
“For example, the loss of the town’s only grocery store limited people’s access to fresh food and also their access to social connection,” she said. “Because it was one of the few central institutions in the community, it operated as a community hub.”
The loss of certain places, such as the area’s pharmacy and health care facility, especially impacted more vulnerable groups, the researchers said. These groups included older adults, people with disabilities and working-class families, who reported delays in accessing care and the loss of trusted care providers.
While both studies illustrated how impactful the loss of these community institutions were to residents, the researchers said future work could continue to explore the loss of essential spaces across other varied, more diverse rural landscapes.
Jennifer Kowalkowski, assistant professor of nursing, and Jorden Jackson, graduate student in rural sociology and demography, were also co-authors on the studies.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture and Penn State’s Social Science Research Institute helped support this research.
National Center for Environmental Health and Children’s Environmental Health Network Funding Mini-grants
The National Center for Environmental Health and Children’s Environmental Health Network are accepting applications from communities for the 2025 Cancer and Environment Mini-Grants: Building Unusual Patterns of Cancer and Environmental Concerns opportunity. The deadline to apply is Jan. 13. Please see below for more information. Please contact Sarah Goodwin (sgoodwin@nchh.org) or Ashely Williams (awilliams@nchh.org) with any questions.
To help communities build capacity and advance scientific understanding of unusual patterns of cancer or efforts to understand potential relationships with environmental hazards, the National Center for Healthy Housing (NCHH) and the Children’s Environmental Health Network (CEHN) invite communities to apply for a bundled award of financial and technical support over six months that includes access to technical assistance from a network of national experts, opportunities to engage in peer learning, and a $25,000 grant that may provide funding for unique needs specific to a community or its members when addressing unusual patterns of cancer and environmental concerns.
They are offering these mini-grants to support communities that have concerns about unusual patterns of cancer. Communities will be able to build capacity, make connections with experts who can evaluate cancer data, review existing or new data on environmental hazards, and develop sustainable workplans to facilitate the investigation of cancer and environmental hazards. Grantees will also have opportunities to connect with other communities that have similar concerns.
Local, regional, U.S. territorial, tribal, or state nonprofit and/or community-based groups or organizations are eligible to apply for this grant opportunity.
Note that groups do not need to be a registered nonprofit or 501(c)(3) to apply. Organizations must be based in the United States. For-profit organizations are not eligible to apply.
Applications are due no later than 11:59 p.m. on Monday, January 13, 2025. To preview the application, visit here. To submit an application, visit here. Please contact Sarah Goodwin (sgoodwin@nchh.org) or Ashely Williams (awilliams@nchh.org) with any questions.
New Funding Available: Rural Health Network Development Planning Program (HRSA-25-037)
Apply by February 19, 2025
The Rural Health Network Development Planning Program supports the planning and development of rural integrated health care networks with specific focus on collaboration of entities to establish or improve local capacity and care coordination in underserved communities.
Specifically, the program uses the concept of developing networks as a strategy for linking rural health care network participants together to achieve greater collective capacity to overcome local challenges, expand access and improve the quality of care in the rural communities these organizations serve.
The program helps network participants work together on three legislative aims:
- Achieve efficiencies
- Expand access to, coordinate, and improve the quality of basic health care services and associated health outcomes
- Strengthen the rural health care system as a whole
The intent is that rural health networks will do the following:
- Expand access to care
- Increase the use of health information technology
- Explore alternative health care delivery models
- Continue to achieve quality health care across the continuum of care
A total of $3,500,000 is available to fund 35 awards at $100,000 each.
Click here for additional information and the application package.
USDA Will Pause Accepting Applications for the Inflation Reduction Act Funding under the Rural Energy for America Program
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under Secretary Dr. Basil Gooden announced that USDA will pause accepting Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) applications for the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP). IRA applications are those requesting federal grant funding of up to 50 percent of total eligible project costs. The last day to submit a new IRA application for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025 funding will be December 31, 2024, at 4:30 PM local time in the respective applicant’s time zone. This decision was made due to the continued overwhelming response to the funding opportunities made possible by IRA.
USDA will close the REAP FY 2025 IRA funding opportunity earlier than anticipated as over 3,000 applications have already been received, requesting more than twice the amount of the announced available funding. This decision will allow USDA time to dedicate the necessary resources and attention to the growing backlog of applications.
Additionally, USDA will not withdraw any FY 2024 IRA applications that have not been fully processed by December 31, 2024. The Agency will continue to process the remaining IRA FY 2024 applications and FY 2025 applications received by December 31, 2024.
Applications that are fully processed, complete and eligible will compete for available funding.
This decision does not affect FY 2025 applications submitted for Farm Bill funding. Farm Bill applications are those requesting federal grant funding of up to 25 percent of total eligible project costs. These applications can be submitted through March 31, 2025.
USDA anticipates accepting both REAP IRA and Farm Bill applications again starting on July 1, 2025, for Fiscal Year 2026 funding.
USDA appreciates your continued support and interest in the Rural Energy for America Program.
For any further inquiries regarding this announcement please contact your State Energy Coordinator.
If you would like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.
FISA Foundation Announces Funding for Access to Care
The FISA Foundation has announced a new request for proposals (RFP) to improve access to health care for people with disabilities in southwestern Pennsylvania. They will be funding grants up to $20,000 as part of a new initiative. The deadline to submit proposals is March 3rd. There is an informational session regarding the RFP on January 29th at 1pm via Zoom.
Click here for more information.
Click here to register for the informational session.
Leapfrog Honors Pennsylvania Leader as ‘Outstanding Healthcare CEO’
From Becker’s Hospital Review
Richard Anderson, longtime president and CEO of St. Luke’s University Health Network, is this year’s recipient of the Steven Schroeder Award for Outstanding Healthcare CEO from Costs of Care and The Leapfrog Group.
The award was established to celebrate “a hospital and/or health system CEO who has demonstrated courageous and ethical leadership addressing the twin issues of affordability and quality.”
Mr. Anderson has been at the helm of Bethlehem, Pa.-based St. Luke’s for nearly 40 years, steering its transformation from a community hospital to a 15-campus system, according to a Dec. 17 news release from the health system. He has also led efforts to expand the network’s education programs, including the establishment of Temple St. Luke’s School of Medicine, the only medical school campus in Pennsylvania’s Lehigh Valley region. St. Luke’s is a nonprofit, integrated system with more than 350 outpatient sites and a workforce comprising more than 20,000 employees.
The health system consistently earns top accolades in major quality and safety programs, including Leapfrog Safety Grades and CMS Hospital Star Ratings. All of St. Luke’s 11 hospitals eligible to participate in the Leapfrog safety survey received “A” grades this year, and 10 of its hospitals earned the highest rating of five stars in CMS’ quality program.
The annual award is named after Steven Schroeder, MD, who spent much of his career mentoring healthcare leaders on advocating for greater affordability and quality in care delivery. He is a professor of health at UC San Francisco and former president and CEO of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
This marks the seventh annual edition of the award from The Leapfrog Group and Costs of Care, a nonprofit organization focused on advancing healthcare affordability.
Read more about the award and past recipients here.
New Study Released on Pediatric Traumatic Dental Injuries in Rural Pennsylvania
Authors from the Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine recently published a study, “Pediatric Traumatic Dental Injuries in Rural Pennsylvania: a 9-Year Retrospective Review.” The study included reviewing health records of 268 pediatric dental patients ages 6 months to 17 years who presented at the emergency department at Geisinger Medical center between July 2010 and July 2019 with traumatic dental injuries (TDIs). The results showed that TDIs were more common in male patients and were most likely to present during summer months. The most common injuries occurred outdoors and were caused by sporting activities.
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Releases Annual Report
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) released the “14th Annual Report to Congress on High-Priority Evidence Gaps for Clinical Preventive Services.” This annual report reflects on preventive recommendations and calls attention to high-priority research gaps related to promoting health across the lifespan. The report also highlights research gaps in underserved populations and high-risk groups.
Appalachian Commission Awards Funds to Collaborative Oral Health Workforce Project in Pennsylvania, Other States
The Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC) awarded $192,050 was awarded to HealthPath Foundation of Ohio to build the oral health workforce and improve access to oral healthcare in North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. Impacting 170 counties across four Appalachian states, this project will engage state partners, educational institutions, and state oral health coalitions (including the PA Coalition for Oral Health) in identifying and detailing state-specific needs to address 144 areas that lack an adequate number of dental health professionals—affecting more than 7.8 million Appalachians.
New Data American Community Survey Data Released
The 2019-2023 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates have been released, providing updated demographic and socio-economic data for Pennsylvania’s counties and municipalities. The report highlights a 4.7% increase in owner-occupied housing units, rising home values, and changes in housing costs for both renters and homeowners.
For a look at these trends and their impact on counties across Pennsylvania, explore the full report.